The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-1890•Hadarou Sare v. Central Collection Unit, (ccu)
25-1890Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 23, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1890
HADAROU SARE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CENTRAL COLLECTION UNIT, (CCU); OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL; TAX REFUND INTERCEPTION PROGRAM, (TRIP);
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Julie R. Rubin, District Judge. (8:24-cv-03637-JRR)
Submitted: December 18, 2025 Decided: December 22, 2025
Before NIEMEYER and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hadarou Sare, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth C. Gauvey, Ariel Shaun Lichterman, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Hadarou Sare appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions to
dismiss Sare’s claims stemming from Defendants’ efforts to collect a debt.* We have
reviewed the record in conjunction with the arguments Sare raises in his informal brief and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order, Sare v. Central
Collection Unit, No. 8:24-cv-03637-JRR (D. Md. Aug. 4, 2025). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Defendant Central Collection Unit filed a motion to stay this appeal pending the
district court’s decision on Sare’s postjudgment motion. The district court denied Sare’s
motion on October 3, 2025, and we thus deny the motion to stay as moot.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.