The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-2005•Darien Cornelius June v. Dick Smith Automotive Group; Scott Fairey; Joseph Stubaus
25-2005Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 17, 2026
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-2005
DARIEN CORNELIUS JUNE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DICK SMITH AUTOMOTIVE GROUP; SCOTT FAIREY; JOSEPH STUBAUS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (3:23-cv-04995-MGL)
Submitted: March 12, 2026 Decided: March 17, 2026
Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darien Cornelius June, Appellant Pro Se. William Lee Duda, Sarah M. Gable,
OGLETREE DEAKINS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Darien Cornelius June appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate
judge’s recommendation to grant Defendants summary judgment on June’s state law
defamation claims and his claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17.* Limiting our review to the issues raised in June’s
informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014),
and to the magistrate judge’s rulings to which June specifically objected, see Martin v.
Duffy, 858 F.3d 239, 245-46 (4th Cir. 2017), we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s order. June v. Dick Smith Auto. Grp., No. 3:23-cv-04995-MGL
(D.S.C. Aug. 5, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* June has filed a motion for appointment of counsel, which we deny.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.