The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-2152•In re: Rickel Marquavius Dani Jeffries
25-2152Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 4, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-2152
In re: RICKEL MARQUAVIUS DANI JEFFRIES,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. (6:25-cv-12313-TMC)
Submitted: November 25, 2025 Decided: December 4, 2025
Before HEYTENS and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rickel Marquavius Dani Jeffries, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Rickel Marquavius Jeffries petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order from
this court directing the district court to appoint counsel for Jeffries in his pending 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 action. Our review of the district court docket reveals that the district court recently
denied Jeffries’s motion for the appointment of counsel and entered a final order dismissing
his § 1983 complaint. Jeffries v. Gen. Assembly of S.C., No. 6:25-cv-12313-TMC (D.S.C.
Nov. 19, 2025). Accordingly, because the case is no longer pending before the district
court, we deny the mandamus petition as moot.∗ We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
∗ A mandamus petition may not serve as a substitute for appeal. See In re Lockheed
Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.