Nigel Max Edge v. Janet Hall

25-2279Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 28, 2026

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-2279
NIGEL MAX EDGE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JANET HALL; KEVIN HALL; KAREN MULQUEEN; PATRICK MULQUEEN;
DIANE GEBHART; BILL SHERWOOD; JEFFREY PAYTON; SUSAN
PAYTON; HOLLY CURRAN; TAMMY WINGERATH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (7:25-cv-00371-BO-KS)
Submitted: January 22, 2026 Decided: January 28, 2026
Before AGEE, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nigel Max Edge, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Nigel Max Edge appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and dismissing Edge’s complaint for failure to state a claim upon
which relief can be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Edge v. Hall, No. 7:25-cv-00371-BO-
KS (E.D.N.C. Oct. 9, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.