Tremel Marquis Rosser v. Marco Rubio; Supreme Court of the United States Legal Team

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-2284
TREMEL MARQUIS ROSSER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARCO RUBIO; SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES LEGAL
TEAM,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 25-2286
TREMEL MARQUIS ROSSER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JEREMY HALL, Badge 2852 Virginia Beach Police; VIRGINIA BEACH
MAGISTRATE,
Defendant - Appellees.
No. 25-2287
TREMEL MARQUIS ROSSER,

-- 1 of 5 --

2
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ARMED FORCES; PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 25-2288
TREMEL MARQUIS ROSSER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KASH PATEL, Director of the FBI,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 25-2298
TREMEL MARQUIS ROSSER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHRIS BARGERY; MARK WARNER; SEAN CAIRNCROSS,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 25-2299

-- 2 of 5 --

3
TREMEL MARQUIS ROSSER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PAUL NEUDIGATE, Chief Virginia Beach Police; MARK P. PITTELLA, Director
of United States Marshal Service; SEAN M. CURRAN, Director of United States
Secret Service; ROCKY HOLCOMB,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 25-2300
TREMEL MARQUIS ROSSER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ELON MUSK; JARED ISAACMAN; TULSI GABBARD; ANNE MELISSA
MILGRAM,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 25-2301
TREMEL MARQUIS ROSSER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KASH PATEL; ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL TODD BLANCHE; PETE
HEGSETH; JOHN L. RATCLIFFE,
Defendants - Appellees.

-- 3 of 5 --

4
No. 25-2302
TREMEL MARQUIS ROSSER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LIEUTENANT GENERAL WILLIAM J. HARTMAN; SARAH A. CARTER;
SUSIE WILES; DAVID O. SACKS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Jamar Kentrell Walker, District Judge. (2:25-cv-00118-JKW-RJK; 2:25-cv-
00104-JKW-RJK; 2:25-cv-00085-JKW-RJK; 2:25-cv-00040-JKW-RJK; 2:25-cv-00510-
JKW-RJK; 2:25-cv-00416-JKW-RJK; 2:25-cv-00158-JKW-RJK; 2:25-cv-00486-JKW-
RJK; 2:25-cv-00502-JKW-RJK)
Submitted: April 28, 2026 Decided: April 30, 2026
Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tremel Marquis Rosser, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 4 of 5 --

5
PER CURIAM:
Tremel Marquis Rosser appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil
actions. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See
4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Rosser’s informal briefs do not challenge the basis for the
district court’s dispositions, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s orders. See
Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important
document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that
brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. Rosser v. Rubio, No. 2:25-cv-
00118-JKW-RJK (E.D. Va. Oct. 6, 2025); Rosser v. Hall, No. 2:25-cv-00104-JKW-RJK
(E.D. Va. Oct. 6, 2025); Rosser v. Armed Forces, No. 2:25-cv-00085-JKW-RJK (E.D. Va.
Oct. 6, 2025); Rosser v. Patel, No. 2:25-cv-00040-JKW-RJK (E.D. Va. Oct. 6, 2025);
Rosser v. Bargery, No. 2:25-cv-00510-JKW-RJK (E.D. Va. Oct. 6, 2025); Rosser v.
Neudigate, No. 2:25-cv-00416-JKW-RJK (E.D. Va. Oct. 6, 2025); Rosser v. Musk, No.
2:25-cv-00158-JKW-RJK (E.D. Va. Oct. 6, 2025); Rosser v. Patel, No. 2:25-cv-00486-
JKW-RJK (E.D. Va. Oct. 6, 2025); Rosser v. Hartman, No. 2:25-cv-00502-JKW-RJK
(E.D. Va. Oct. 6, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 5 of 5 --