The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-2360•JARIN M. WRAY, Dr. v. Rtx Corporation
25-2360Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 29, 2026
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-2360
JARIN M. WRAY, Dr.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RTX CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:25-cv-00656-MOC-SCR)
Submitted: June 25, 2026 Decided: June 29, 2026
Before BENJAMIN and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jarin M. Wray, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Michael Anderson, Hampton Hunter
Bruton, Kirk Gibson Warner, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL
& JERNIGAN, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jarin M. Wray appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action alleging
violations of various federal statutes by his former employer. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
Wray v. RTX Corp., No. 3:25-cv-00656-MOC-SCR (W.D.N.C. Oct. 20, 2025). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.