The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-2453•Branden D. Hargrove v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
25-2453Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 29, 2026
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-2453
BRANDEN D. HARGROVE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:25-cv-00433-FL)
Submitted: June 25, 2026 Decided: June 29, 2026
Before BENJAMIN and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Branden D. Hargrove, Appellant Pro Se. James Scott Lewis, Diane Kristine Pappayliou,
BUTLER SNOW LLP, Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Branden D. Hargrove appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action
for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim, and denying his Fed.
R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter the judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. Hargove v. State Farm
Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., No. 5:25-cv-00433-FL (E.D.N.C. Oct. 14, 2025; Dec. 1, 2025). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.