The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-6025•United States of America v. LLOYD MACK ROYAL, III, a/k/a Blyss, a/k/a B, a/k/a Furious
25-6025Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 4, 2026
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6025
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LLOYD MACK ROYAL, III, a/k/a Blyss, a/k/a B, a/k/a Furious,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:09-cr-00048-TDC-1)
Submitted: February 26, 2026 Decided: March 3, 2026
Before NIEMEYER and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lloyd Mack Royal, III, Appellant Pro Se. David Christian Bornstein, Assistant United
States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lloyd Mack Royal, III, appeals the district court’s order denying his
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. We have reviewed the
record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Royal’s pending motions
and affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Royal, No. 8:09-cr-00048-TDC-1
(D. Md. Dec. 6, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.