The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-6032•William Arthur Brown v. GRAHAM MULLIS, U.S. District Judge
25-6032Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 30, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6032
WILLIAM ARTHUR BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GRAHAM MULLIS, U.S. District Judge; GRETCHEN SHEPPERT; BOBBY
HIGDON; NOELL P. TIN; ROBERT F. SIMONE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (3:24-cv-00706-MR)
Submitted: September 25, 2025 Decided: September 30, 2025
Before GREGORY and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Arthur Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William Arthur Brown appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order and judgment. Brown v. Mullis, No. 3:24-
cv-00706-MR (W.D.N.C. Dec. 11, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.