United States of America v. Trezith Rashad Smart

25-6123Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 26, 2025

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6123
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TREZITH RASHAD SMART,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Newport News. David J. Novak, District Judge. (4:18-cr-00095-DJN-LRL-1)
Submitted: August 21, 2025 Decided: August 26, 2025
Before WILKINSON, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Trezith Rashad Smart, Appellant Pro Se. Devon Elise Alston Heath, Assistant United
States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, Julie Podlesni, Assistant United States Attorney,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Trezith Rashad Smart appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new
trial. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s order. United States v. Smart, No. 4:18-cr-00095-DJN-LRL-1 (E.D. Va.
Jan. 21, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.