United States of America v. Jacqueline Tatiana Cuellar

25-6161Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 1, 2025

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6161
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JACQUELINE TATIANA CUELLAR,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Harrisonburg. Elizabeth K. Dillon, Chief District Judge. (5:21-cr-00007-EKD-JCH-6)
Submitted: August 28, 2025 Decided: October 1, 2025
Before GREGORY, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jacqueline Tatiana Cuellar, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst, Assistant United
States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Jacqueline Tatiana Cuellar appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction. “We review a district court’s decision
[whether] to reduce a sentence under § 3582(c)(2) for abuse of discretion and its ruling as
to the scope of its legal authority under § 3582(c)(2) de novo.” United States v. Mann, 709
F.3d 301, 304 (4th Cir. 2013). Our review of the record reveals no reversible error. The
district court clearly understood its authority to reduce Cuellar’s sentence, but the court
declined to grant a reduction based on its review of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.