The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-6195•United States of America v. Daniel N. Kemp, Sr.
25-6195Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 8, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6195
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DANIEL N. KEMP, SR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:19-cr-00149-BO-2)
Submitted: July 21, 2025 Decided: August 8, 2025
Before HARRIS and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel N. Kemp, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Daniel N. Kemp, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his postjudgment
motions for release of garnished funds, fee-free copies, change of venue or recusal, and
appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Kemp, No. 5:19-cr-
00149-BO-2 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 12, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.