The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-6211•Oscar Perez v. RONNIE LANE HUNEYCUTT, Warden at Alexander Correctional Institution
25-6211Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 29, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6211
OSCAR PEREZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RONNIE LANE HUNEYCUTT, Warden at Alexander Correctional Institution,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Statesville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (5:22-cv-00120-MR)
Submitted: July 24, 2025 Decided: July 29, 2025
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Oscar Perez, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Oscar Perez appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Ronnie
Lane Huneycutt in Perez’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Our review of the record leads us to
conclude that the district court did not reversibly err in finding that Huneycutt was entitled
to qualified immunity on Perez’s claims for damages and that Perez’s claims for injunctive
and declaratory relief were moot. Accordingly, we deny Perez’s motion for assignment of
counsel and affirm the district court’s order. Perez v. Huneycutt, No. 5:22-cv-00120-MR
(W.D.N.C. Mar. 10, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.