The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-6227•Thomas Covington, Jr. v. Betty Brown; Katy Poole; Charlie Locklear; Sarah McLucas- Floyd; Reginald J. Bowens
25-6227Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 26, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6227
THOMAS COVINGTON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BETTY BROWN; KATY POOLE; CHARLIE LOCKLEAR; SARAH MCLUCAS-
FLOYD; REGINALD J. BOWENS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:21-cv-00385-WO-JEP)
Submitted: August 21, 2025 Decided: August 26, 2025
Before WILKINSON, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Covington, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Covington, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to Defendants in
Covington’s civil action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Religious Land Use
and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc to 2000cc-5. We have
reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s judgment. Covington v. Brown, No. 1:21-cv-00385-WO-JEP (M.D.N.C.
Mar. 3, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.