The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-6256•Walter Timothy Gause v. Frank Zimmerman
25-6256Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 17, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6256
WALTER TIMOTHY GAUSE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FRANK ZIMMERMAN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:22-ct-03049-FL)
Submitted: June 12, 2025 Decided: June 17, 2025
Before HARRIS and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Walter Timothy Gause, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Walter Timothy Gause appeals the district court’s order granting summary
judgment to Defendant, denying as moot his cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings
and summary judgment, and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil action for lack of
administrative exhaustion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Gause v. Zimmerman, No.
5:22-ct-03049-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.