The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-6271•Michael Thurston v. Officers of Henrico County Police Department
25-6271Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 30, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6271
MICHAEL THURSTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICERS OF HENRICO COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; TORREY
HARRISON, Badge #1714; JUSTIN BENDLE, Badge #1586; JENNIFER CLARK,
Badge #948; CHRISTOPHER T., Badge #1658; ANDREW MARTIN, Badge
#1840; KELLEY BRENDAN, Badge #1538; CHRISTOPHER B., Badge #1020;
SHORETTA D. FORD, Badge #1828,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Roderick Charles Young, District Judge. (3:24-cv-00487-RCY-MRC)
Submitted: May 22, 2025 Decided: June 30, 2025
Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Thurston, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Thurston appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint as time-barred. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Thurston v. Henrico Cnty. Police Dep’t,
No. 3:24-cv-00487-RCY-MRC (E.D. Va., March 24, 2025). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.