Walter Lee Wright v. Officer Kyle Baxter

25-6272Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 21, 2025

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6272
WALTER LEE WRIGHT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER KYLE BAXTER; SGT. BRETT TRAHAN; OFFICER MICHAEL
NELSON; OFFICER JONATHAN JOHNSON; OFFICER MATTHEW WOOD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (1:24-cv-01966-DKC)
Submitted: October 16, 2025 Decided: October 21, 2025
Before KING, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Walter Lee Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Erin Jeanne Ashbarry, Kristen Joanne Nunley,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Walter Lee Wright seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing in part
Wright’s amended complaint and denying Wright’s motions to amend the complaint and
substitute a party. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order
Wright seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral
order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.