The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-6302•Felissa Anne Grissett v. Judge B. Alex Hyman
25-6302Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 1, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6302
FELISSA ANNE GRISSETT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JUDGE B. ALEX HYMAN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.
Joseph Dawson, III, District Judge. (4:25-cv-02869-JD-KDW)
Submitted: July 29, 2025 Decided: August 1, 2025
Before KING, WYNN, and BERNER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Felissa Anne Grissett, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Felissa Anne Grissett seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order granting her
motion to proceed in forma pauperis and directing her to provide sufficient information for
an initial review of her complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292;
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
The order Grissett seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory
or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny all pending motions and dismiss the appeal for
lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.