The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-6465•United States of America v. George Harris
25-6465Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 21, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6465
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
GEORGE HARRIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:88-cr-00076-AWA-1)
Submitted: October 16, 2025 Decided: October 21, 2025
Before KING, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Harris, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
George Harris appeals the district court’s order denying his second motion for
compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have reviewed the record
and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by finding that the 18 U.S.C.
§ 3553(a) factors weighed against granting relief. See United States v. Malone, 57 F.4th
167, 172 (4th Cir. 2023) (stating standard of review).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Harris, No. 2:88-
cr-00076-AWA-1 (E.D. Va. May 6, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.