United States of America v. Eric L. Jackson, a/k/a Tango

25-6478Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 30, 2025

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6478
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ERIC L. JACKSON, a/k/a Tango,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Wheeling. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (5:01-cr-00004-JPB-MJA-1)
Submitted: September 25, 2025 Decided: September 30, 2025
Before GREGORY and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric L. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer Therese Conklin, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Eric L. Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
motion for a sentence reduction based on Amendment 821 to the Sentencing Guidelines.
The district court found that Jackson was eligible for a sentence reduction but declined to
reduce his sentence based on its assessment of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. Upon
review, we discern no abuse of discretion in the court’s decision. See United States v.
Martin, 916 F.3d 389, 395 (4th Cir. 2019) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Jackson, No. 5:01-cr-00004-JPB-MJA-1
(N.D. W. Va. May 15, 2025).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.