The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-6493•Monta Brown v. Rhonda Langford; Mark Kitchen
25-6493Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 10, 2026
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6493
MONTA BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RHONDA LANGFORD; MARK KITCHEN,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
BERENICE PONCE, Counselor,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, Chief District Judge. (3:23-cv-00194-MHL-MRC)
Submitted: December 18, 2025 Decided: February 9, 2026
Before NIEMEYER and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Monta Markjues Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Dorothy Patricia Wallace, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Monta Brown appeals the district court’s order granting Appellees’ motion for
summary judgment on Brown’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Brown’s motion for appointment of
counsel and affirm the district court’s judgment. Brown v. Ponce, No. 3:23-cv-00194-
MHL-MRC (E.D. Va. May 13, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.