The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-6497•United States of America v. Gena C. Randolph
25-6497Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 4, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6497
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
GENA C. RANDOLPH,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:17-cr-00302-RMG-1)
Submitted: August 19, 2025 Decided: September 4, 2025
Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gena C. Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gena C. Randolph appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to reduce
her monthly restitution payment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny Randolph’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm the district court’s
order. United States v. Randolph, No. 2:17-cr-00302-RMG-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 29, 2025). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.