The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-6498•Andre Youngblood v. Honorable Richard M. Gergel; Amberelle N. Wells; Lasheika S. Vandyke
25-6498Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 3, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6498
ANDRE YOUNGBLOOD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HONORABLE RICHARD M. GERGEL; AMBERELLE N. WELLS; LASHEIKA
S. VANDYKE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock
Hill. Jacquelyn Denise Austin, District Judge. (0:24-cv-06372-JDA)
Submitted: August 28, 2025 Decided: September 3, 2025
Before GREGORY, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andre Youngblood, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Andre Youngblood appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Youngblood’s amended
complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). He also appeals the district
court’s text order denying his motion for reconsideration. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s orders. Youngblood v. Gergel, No. 0:24-cv-06372-JDA (D.S.C. May 30 &
June 10, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.