The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-6578•United States of America v. Travis Brock Byrd
25-6578Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 3, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6578
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TRAVIS BROCK BYRD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:18-cr-00204-D-2)
Submitted: November 25, 2025 Decided: December 2, 2025
Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Travis Brock Byrd, Appellant Pro Se. David A. Bragdon, Assistant United States Attorney,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Travis Brock Byrd appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of sentence. After reviewing the record, we conclude
that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Byrd’s motion. See United
States v. Spruhan, 989 F.3d 266, 269 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of review).
Accordingly, we deny Byrd’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm the district court’s
order. United States v. Byrd, No. 5:18-cr-00204-D-2 (E.D.N.C. July 15, 2025).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.