The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-6708•Ronnie B. Bullock v. JAMES HAMBY, Dentist; D. BALL, N.P.
25-6708Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 4, 2026
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6708
RONNIE B. BULLOCK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JAMES HAMBY, Dentist; D. BALL, N.P.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Senior District Judge. (7:23-cv-00337-MFU-JCH)
Submitted: February 26, 2026 Decided: March 3, 2026
Before NIEMEYER and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronnie B. Bullock, Appellant Pro Se. Nathan Henry Schnetzler, FRITH, ANDERSON &
PEAKE, PC, Roanoke, Virginia; Rosalie Fessier, Brittany Elizabeth Shipley,
TIMBERLAKESMITH, Staunton, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ronnie B. Bullock appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motions
for summary judgment and dismissing Bullock’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for failure to exhaust
his administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Bullock v. Hamby, No. 7:23-cv-00337-
MFU-JCH (W.D. Va. Aug. 5, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.