United States of America v. Evan Foreman

25-6739Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 24, 2025

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6739
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
EVAN FOREMAN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, Senior District Judge. (1:11-cr-00398-JKB-3)
Submitted: December 18, 2025 Decided: December 23, 2025
Before NIEMEYER and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Evan Foreman, Appellant Pro Se. David Christian Bornstein, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Evan Foreman appeals the district court’s order denying his fifth motion for
compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We have reviewed the record and
conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by finding that the 18 U.S.C.
§ 3553(a) factors weighed against Foreman’s release. See United States v. Malone,
57 F.4th 167, 172 (4th Cir. 2023) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order. United States v. Foreman, No. 1:11-cr-00398-JKB-3 (D. Md. Aug.
19, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.