Patrick O’neal Harris v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

25-6806Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 25, 2026

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6806
PATRICK O’NEAL HARRIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; W. PISTORY; TIMOTHY YOUNG; S.
JANSON; L. NEWCOMBE; T. HAMILTON; A. LEMOS; P. DAVIS; R. FERRY;
COLEMAN; EVANS; K. BORNODEN; WELLS; NEVILS; D. COOPER;
PARKER; A. BRAYES; C. BARSH; PRESTON; MOREAUS; WILLIARD;
SCREWS; GUSS; VINDANVER; LOVETT; ELLISON; C. THORPE; B. PEREZ;
HOWARD; READY; M. ALLEN; A. BRINSON; K. RIDGEWAY; RANDOLPH;
R. VELEZ; K. JULIAN; L. BRABHAM; M. TAYLOR; C. RODRIGUES;
DORSEY; S. GIANELLI; K. WOHLGEMUTH; MORGAN; A. ANDERSON;
SCHMIDTZ; F. COLLINS; DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF
PRISONS; JOHN DOES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (2:23-cv-06282-DCC)
Submitted: February 19, 2026 Decided: February 24, 2026
Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Patrick O’Neal Harris, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Patrick O’Neal Harris appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Harris’s complaint filed
pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.
388 (1971), the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346, 2671-2680, and other
causes of action not relevant to this appeal. We have reviewed the record, as well as the
issues raised in Harris’s informal brief, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s judgment. Harris v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 2:23-cv-06282-
DCC (D.S.C. Sep. 4, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.