The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-6816•David Forbes v. A.S.G.D.C.; LEONARDO BROWN; CRAYMAN HARVEY; DR. SHAFFER; MR. PAMPEL, a/k/a Mr. Pamper
25-6816Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 1, 2026
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6816
DAVID FORBES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
A.S.G.D.C.; LEONARDO BROWN; CRAYMAN HARVEY; DR. SHAFFER;
MR. PAMPEL, a/k/a Mr. Pamper,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock
Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (0:24-cv-01054-JFA)
Submitted: May 28, 2026 Decided: June 1, 2026
Before WYNN, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Forbes, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred Johnston Cox, Lindsay Anne Joyner, James
Clayton Mitchell, III, GALLIVAN, WHITE & BOYD, PA, Columbia, South Carolina;
Mark Brandon Goddard, TURNER PADGET GRAHAM & LANEY, PA, Columbia,
South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David Forbes appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for
summary judgment and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
Forbes v. Alvin S. Glenn Det. Ctr., No. 0:24-cv-01054-JFA (D.S.C. Sep. 2, 2025). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.