The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-6964•Phillip Edward Hill v. Frederick County Maryland District Court
25-6964Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 4, 2026
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6964
PHILLIP EDWARD HILL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FREDERICK COUNTY MARYLAND DISTRICT COURT; DINO FLORES,
District Court Judge; BRETT ANGLER, States Attorney; ALAN WINIK,
Plaintiff’s Ex Counsel; FREDERICK COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Lydia Kay Griggsby, District Judge. (1:24-cv-01897-LKG)
Submitted: February 26, 2026 Decided: March 3, 2026
Before NIEMEYER and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Phillip E. Hill, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Phillip E. Hill appeals the district court’s order dismissing his pro se amended civil
complaint. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s order. Hill v. Frederick Cnty. Md. Dist. Ct., No. 1:24-cv-01897-
LKG (D. Md. filed Oct. 24, 2025 & entered Oct. 27, 2025). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.