The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-7011•Brian Bady v. Ms. Kearny; Ms. Suggs; Ms. Gerannul; Ms. Mattock
25-7011Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 2, 2026
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-7011
BRIAN BADY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MS. KEARNY; MS. SUGGS; MS. GERANNUL; MS. MATTOCK,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:25-ct-03013-FL)
Submitted: May 28, 2026 Decided: June 2, 2026
Before WYNN, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brian Bady, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Brian Bady, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
order. Bady v. Kearny, No. 5:25-ct-03013-FL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 18, 2025). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.