The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
26-1051•In re: Michael R. White
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 26-1051
In re: MICHAEL R. WHITE,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. (1:21-cv-00309-ELH)
Submitted: April 23, 2026 Decided: April 28, 2026
Before NIEMEYER, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael R. White, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael R. White petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court
failed to rule on his motion for reconsideration in the underlying case in which White is
not a party prior to transmitting the defendant’s appeal in that cast to this court. He seeks
an order from this court directing the district court to act on his motion. Our review of the
district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied White’s motion on January 29,
2026. We deny White’s motion seeking to prohibit dismissal of the appeal of the
underlying judgment and, because the district court has ruled on White’s motion, we deny
the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.