The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
26-1123•In re: Edward Dane Jeffus
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 26-1123
In re: EDWARD DANE JEFFUS,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. (6:92-cr-00184-WO-2; 6:95-cv-00227-NCT)
Submitted: March 26, 2026 Decided: March 30, 2026
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Dane Jeffus, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Edward Dane Jeffus petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court
has unduly delayed acting on his objections to the magistrate judge’s report recommending
construing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as an unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255
motion and dismissing it on that basis. Jeffus seeks an order from this court directing the
district court to rule on his objections. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that
the district court accepted the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissed Jeffus’s
motion by order entered March 2, 2026. United States v. Jeffus, No. 6:92-cr-00184-WO-2
(M.D.N.C., PACER Nos. 432, 433). Accordingly, because the district court has recently
decided Jeffus’s motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.