The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
26-1290•Shirley Boatwright v. Pamela Valdez
26-1290Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 10, 2026
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 26-1290
SHIRLEY BOATWRIGHT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PAMELA VALDEZ,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Roderick Charles Young, District Judge. (3:25-cv-00352-RCY)
Submitted: June 18, 2026 Decided: July 10, 2026
Before AGEE, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shirley Boatwright, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland Hambrick, Assistant United
States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Shirley Boatwright appeals the district court’s order dismissing her claim under the
Federal Tort Claims Act for lack of subject matter jurisdiction for failure to exhaust
administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Boatwright v. Valdez, No. 3:25-cv-00352-
RCY (E.D. Va. Feb. 20, 2026). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.