In re: Hamza Tebib, individually and derivatively on behalf of his 2 business entities

26-1331Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 13, 2026

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 26-1331
In re: HAMZA TEBIB, individually and derivatively on behalf of his 2 business
entities,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. (5:25-cv-00358-D-KS)
Submitted: May 11, 2026 Decided: May 13, 2026
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hamza Tebib, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Hamza Tebib petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court Clerk
has unduly delayed in entering default against certain Defendants under Fed. R. Civ. P.
55(a). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court Clerk to act. The
present record does not reveal undue delay by the district court Clerk. Accordingly, we
deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.