The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
26-6087•Bruce Allen Buckner v. Scott Harris
26-6087Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 1, 2026
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 26-6087
BRUCE ALLEN BUCKNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SCOTT HARRIS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken.
Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:25-cv-12802-JFA)
Submitted: June 25, 2026 Decided: June 30, 2026
Amended: June 30, 2026
Before BENJAMIN and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bruce Allen Buckner, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Bruce Allen Buckner appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Buckner’s civil complaint.
Buckner has also filed a motion for review, a motion to amend his motion for review, and
a motion to add evidence. We deny those motions. We have reviewed the record and
discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Buckner v.
Harris, No. 1:25-cv-12802-JFA (D.S.C. Dec. 31, 2025). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.