The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
26-6253•Toccara Yvonne Puller v. Maggie Marshall
26-6253Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 2, 2026
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 26-6253
TOCCARA YVONNE PULLER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MAGGIE MARSHALL; DENISE ZELAYA; WILLIAM TURNER; JASON
MCCANDLES; AL HARVIN DISTRICT; ALLISON CANNON, LCSW; C.
LOWELL; KAREN HAINER, Esq.; GARCIA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:25-cv-00706-JAG-MRC)
Submitted: May 28, 2026 Decided: June 2, 2026
Before WYNN, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Toccara Yvonne Puller, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Toccara Yvonne Puller appeals the district court’s order dismissing without
prejudice her pro se civil action.* The district court dismissed Puller’s civil action because
she failed to comply with the magistrate judge’s order to complete and file a non-prisoner
in forma pauperis affidavit or pay the full filing fee. We have reviewed the record and
discern no reversible error. See Attkisson v. Holder, 925 F.3d 606, 620 (4th Cir. 2019)
(stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Puller v.
Marshall, No. 3:25-cv-00706-JAG-MRC (E.D. Va. Jan. 22, 2026). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The district court’s dismissal order is a final decision because the court dismissed
the action “without providing leave to amend.” Britt v. DeJoy, 45 F.4th 790, 796 (4th Cir.
2022) (en banc).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.