The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
26-6286•William Parke Custis v. RICHARD S. PHILLIPS, Esquire
26-6286Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 21, 2026
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 26-6286
WILLIAM PARKE CUSTIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RICHARD S. PHILLIPS, Esquire,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. David J. Novak, District Judge. (3:25-cv-00775-DJN-MRC)
Submitted: July 16, 2026 Decided: July 21, 2026
Before WILKINSON, RICHARDSON, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Parke Custis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William Parke Custis appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A. We have reviewed the record
and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Custis v.
Phillips, No. 3:25-cv-00775-DJN-MRC (E.D. Va. Jan. 29, 2026). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.