The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
26-6435•United States of America v. Brandon Lashon Ingram, a/k/a Brandon Lashun Ingram, a/k/a Little B, a/k/a B
26-6435Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 9, 2026
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 26-6435
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BRANDON LASHON INGRAM, a/k/a Brandon Lashun Ingram, a/k/a Little B,
a/k/a B,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:12-cr-00020-D-1)
Submitted: June 25, 2026 Decided: July 9, 2026
Before QUATTLEBAUM and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brandon Lashon Ingram, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Brandon Lashon Ingram appeals the district court’s order denying his second motion
for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We conclude that the district
court did not abuse its discretion in determining that, even if Ingram had established
extraordinary and compelling reasons for release, the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors
counseled against granting relief. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United
States v. Ingram, No. 5:12-cr-00020-D-1 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 20, 2025). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.