Craft v. Hicks

01-30154Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitAug 20, 2001

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-30154
Summary Calendar
ALFRED M. CRAFT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
SHEREE ROAD HICKS, Defendant-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 00-CV-425
--------------------
August 17, 2001
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Alfred M. Craft appeals the district court’s grant of Sheree
Road Hicks’ motion for summary judgment and the dismissal of his
suit, which was brought pursuant to the Wire and Electronic
Communication Interception and Interception of Oral Communication
Law. Craft has not shown how Simpson v. Simpson, 490 F.2d 803
(5th Cir. 1974), upon which the district court relied in
dismissing his suit, is distinguishable from his case or
explained why it should not control. He thus has not shown that
the district court erred in granting Hicks’ motion for summary

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 01-30154
-2-
judgment and dismissing his case. Accordingly, the judgment of
the district court is AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.