United States v. Sanchez-Carrasco

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
December 17, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-50621
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JORGE SANCHEZ-CARRASCO,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. P-02-CR-00250-ALL
--------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Relying on Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004),
Jorge Sanchez-Carrasco argues that the district court erred by
imposing a sentence based on facts that were neither admitted nor
found by a jury beyond reasonable doubt. The Government has
moved for summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s
brief because the issue is foreclosed in this circuit under
United States v. Pineiro, 377 F.3d 464 (5th Cir. 2004), petition
for cert. filed (U.S. July 14, 2004) (No. 04-5263). The issue is

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 03-50621
-2-
indeed foreclosed. See Pineiro, 377 F.3d at 473. Accordingly,
the Government’s motion is GRANTED, and the judgment of the
district court is AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --