The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-60688•Hong v. Ashcroft
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances
set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
November 15, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-60688
SHI PING HONG,
Petitioner,
versus
JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondent.
Petitions for Review from an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
(BIA No.A77-775-238)
_______________________________________________________
Before REAVLEY, WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The petitioner failed to prove that he is eligible for asylum. The Immigration
Judge found no credible evidence that the petitioner suffered past persecution under
China’s one-child policy. PETITION DENIED.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.