The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-10630•Rosales v. BICE
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
December 21, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-10630
Summary Calendar
ADRIAN ROSALES,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT,
Respondent-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:03-CV-115
--------------------
Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Adrian Rosales, Texas prisoner # 1015463, appeals from the
district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in
which sued the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement to
attack his 2002 removal order. The district court held that it
lacked jurisdiction over the petition because Rosales, who is
currently serving a 65-year state sentence for aggravated
kidnaping, is not is not in custody on any immigration charge.
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 04-10630
-2-
Rosales has not demonstrated error in the district court's
determination that he failed to meet the “in custody” requirement
for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 2241 jurisdiction. See Zolicoffer v.
United States Dep’t of Justice, 315 F.3d 538, 540 (5th Cir.
2003); United States ex rel. Marcello v. Dist. Director, INS,
634 F.2d 964, 970 (5th Cir. 1981).
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.