Ficq v. TX Instruments Inc, et al

04-10670Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitDec 1, 2004

Full text

United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
December 1, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
In the
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit
_______________
m 04-10670
_______________
BERNARD FICQ,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS, INCORPORATED,
A DELAWARE CORPORATION;
THOMAS J. ENGIBOUS,
INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD, PRESIDENT, AND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF TEXAS INSTRUMENTS, INC.;
RICHARD K. TEMPLETON,
INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF
OPERATING OFFICER OF TEXAS INSTRUMENTS, INCORPORATED, AND PRESIDENT OF THE
SEMICONDUCTOR GROUP OF TEXAS INSTRUMENTS, INCORPORATED,
Defendants-Appellees.
_________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
m 3:02-CV-1273-D
_________________________

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Before DAVIS, SMITH and DENNIS,
Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Proceeding pro se, Bernard Ficq alleges
only two federal claims against his former em-
ployer, Texas Instruments, Inc., and two of its
officers: intentional discrimination under 42
U.S.C. § 1981 and conspiracy under 42 U.S.C.
§ 1985. He claims he was unlawfully ter-
minated on the basis of his “status as a U.S.
citizen.”
Based on the thorough findings and rec-
ommendation of the magistrate judge, the
district court dismissed Ficq’s federal claims
with prejudice and his state claims without
prejudice. The judgment of dismissal is
AFFIRMED, essentially for the reasons given
by the magistrate judge.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has de-
termined that this opinion should not be published
and is not precedent except under the limited cir-
cumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.