Martinez v. Prestige Ford

04-10789Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitJan 14, 2005

Full text

*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
January 14, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-10789
Summary Calendar
GRACIELA MARTINEZ,
Plaintiff-Appellant
versus
PRESTIGE FORD GARLAND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
doing business as Prestige Ford,
Defendant-Appellee
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Northern District of Texas
(USDC No. 3:03-CV-251-L)
Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
We affirm the grant of summary judgment to defendant for
essentially the reasons stated by Judge Lindsay in his detailed
memorandum opinion.
AFFIRMED.

-- 1 of 1 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.