Davis v. BICE, et al

04-30583Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitDec 17, 2004

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
** Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
December 17, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-30583
Conference Calendar
RONE DAVIS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT;
JOHN ASHCROFT; CHARLES JEAN; UNITED STATES EMBASSY
PORT AU PRINCE HAITI; CONSULATE OF HAITI,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 2:03-CV-01243-PM-APW
--------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Rone Davis appeals the district court’s dismissal of his
complaint alleging Bivens** claims relating to his pending
deportation to Haiti. Davis’s motion to supplement the record is
denied. See United States v. Flores, 887 F.2d 543, 546 (5th Cir.
1986).

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 04-30583
-2-
Davis asks that we 1) interpret the naturalization
provisions of the Bahamian and Haitian Constitutions, 2) award
monetary damages against the Bahamas and Haiti, 3) order his
release in connection with our review and interpretation of the
Bahamian and Haitian Constitutions, and 4) enjoin the parties
from issuing “fraudulent” Haitian travel documents. We lack
jurisdiction to grant such relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 1604.
Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is affirmed.
MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT DENIED; JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.