The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-60282•Freelance Entrtnmt, et al v. Sanders, et al
04-60282Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitOct 25, 2004
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.
47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
October 25, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-60282
Summary Calendar
FREELANCE ENTERTAINMENT, LLC;
J. B. HUNT; PAMELA RUSHING, Individually,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
versus
HARRY SANDERS; J. L. WILLIAMS,
TOMMY SOUTHERLAND; JOE BROOKS;
LEROY BROOKS, In their Official Capacities
as members of the Board of Supervisors of
Lowndes County, Mississippi, C. B. “BUTCH
HOWARD, In his Official Capacity as Sheriff
of Lowndes County, Mississippi,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for
the Northern District of Mississippi
(USDC No. 3:02-CV-109-M-B)
_______________________________________________________
Before REAVLEY, WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
-- 1 of 2 --
2
The district court correctly determined that the motion for attorney’s fees was
untimely. See Romaguera v. Gegenheim, 162 F.3d 893 (5th Cir. 1998). Thus, the
judgment is AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.