Deramus v. Resol Trust Corp, et al

*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.
47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
November 4, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-60291
Summary Calendar
JODY H. DERAMUS,
Plaintiff-Aappellant,
versus
RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION (RTC);
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
(FDIC); COMMONWEALTH TITLE INSURANCE
COMPANY; CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for
the Northern District of Mississippi
(USDC No. 1:02-CV-311-P)
_______________________________________________________
Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE and GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
We affirm the judgment for the following reasons:

-- 1 of 2 --

2
1. The district court’s grant of summary judgment did not deny Doramus
due process. Oglesby v. Terminal Transport Co., 543 F.2d 1111,
1113 (5th Cir. 1976).
2. Doramus has not presented a triable issue on her claims regarding
violations of zoning laws and restrictive covenants, because her lack of
standing to pursue those claims has been preclusively determined in a
previous suit. See Winters v. Diamond Shamrock Chem. Co., 149 F.3d
387, 391 (5th Cir. 1998).
3. Doramus has not made any showing that defendants made a false
statement to her with knowledge of the statement’s falsity or ignorance
of its truth, and thus has not presented a triable claim of fraud under
Mississippi law. See Gamble v. Dollar Gen. Corp., 852 So.2d 5, 10
(Miss. 2003).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --