United States v. Rodriguez-Naranjo

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
February 14, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-10137
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CELESTINA RODRIGUEZ-NARANJO,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 6:04-CR-51-2
--------------------
Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Celestina Rodriguez-
Naranjo has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Rodriguez-Naranjo has not filed a response to counsel’s motion.
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Rodriguez-Naranjo’s motion for the appointment of a
substitute attorney is DENIED.

-- 1 of 1 --