Amer Bd Obstetrics v. Yoonessi, et al

05-11496Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitNov 29, 2006

Full text

*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
November 29, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
` IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________________
No. 05-11496
Summary Calendar
__________________________
AMERICAN BOARD OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY,
Plaintiffs,
MAHMOOD YOONESSI, M.D.
Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM M. SKRETNY,
Third Party Defendant-Appellee.
___________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
(No. 3:05-CV-1561)
___________________________________________________
Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Dr. Mahmood Yoonessi, acting
pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his

-- 1 of 2 --

2
third party complaint against the Honorable William M. Skretny on the basis of absolute
judicial immunity. We affirm.
The American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology (the “Board”) filed suit in Texas
state court against Yoonessi for,
inter alia, abuse of process based upon prior lawsuits
Yoonessi had filed against the Board and various other individuals. One of the prior cases
was heard by Judge Skretny in the United States District Court for the Western District of
New York, who resolved the case against Yoonessi. After the Board sued Yoonessi in Texas
state court, Yoonessi answered and filed third party complaints against various defendants
and against Judge Skretny. Judge Skretny, through the United States Attorney’s Office,
removed to federal court where the claim against him was dismissed on the basis of
absolute immunity. The district court remanded the remaining claims by the Board and
Yoonessi to state court.
Yoonessi complains solely of Judge Skretny’s actions with respect to the prior
litigation in the Western District of New York. Judge Skretny is entitled to absolute judicial
immunity.
Boyd v. Biggers, 31 F.3d 279, 284 (5th Cir. 1994) (“Judicial officers are entitled
to absolute immunity from claims for damages arising out of acts performed in the exercise
of their judicial functions.”). To the extent that Yoonessi raises issues regarding various
other third-party defendants, the district court has, in its discretion, remanded the
remaining claims to state court. Yoonessi has offered no reasons why this court should
review that decision.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.