The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-20054•United States v. Parker
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
September 5, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-20054
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
VICTOR PARKER,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:04-CR-224-1
--------------------
Before KING, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Victor Parker has
renewed his motion for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Parker has not filed a response. Counsel avers that Parker has
served his term of incarceration and is not being supervised.
Based on our review of the record and counsel’s representations,
we conclude that there is no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. See
United States v. Clark, 193 F.3d 845, 847-48 (5th Cir. 1999).
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 05-20054
-2-
is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL
IS DISMISSED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.